Home > Failed To > Ata Failed To Set Xfermode

Ata Failed To Set Xfermode

Contents

Seeing as it's not been confirmed nor set as lacking information - what's next? Thanks! http://www.cromwell-intl.com/unix/linux-kernel.html Comment 48 Rob Geelen 2009-07-22 20:27:53 UTC Thanks for that. The best way for you is to fallow this link : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9505 This is copy of this bug report upstream. http://smartnewsolutions.com/failed-to/failed-to-add-entry-index-generation-failed-at-usr-sbin-smbldap-useradd-line.html

Comment 30 Alessandro Perugini 2009-03-19 00:43:00 UTC i have partially solved; with kernel 2.6.18-6 (debian) if i disable pata (old eide) support from ML110G4 matherboard bios i will stop error (err_mask=0x4) Adv Reply Reply With Quote Quick Navigation Hardware Top Site Areas Settings Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home Forums The Ubuntu Forum Community Ubuntu Official Flavours Support Down-voting might cost you karma, but you should consider doing so for incorrect or clearly detrimental questions and answers. What we have to do to send the patch upstream?Thanks againRegards Offline #4 2010-11-04 22:18:14 whaevr Member Registered: 2008-03-17 Posts: 182 Re: ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) since 2.6.36 Np

Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40

The time now is 03:37 AM. Hello, If you are going to try to skip SETXFER, I think you will need an entry in ata_device_blacklist, something like this. Launchpad couldn't connect to Linux Kernel Bug Tracker. (what does this mean?) Affecting: Linux Filed here by: Oleksij Rempel When: 2007-12-05 Started work: 2007-12-08 Completed: 2007-12-08 Target Distribution Baltix BOSS Juju Thanks a lot for the help so far Oleksij Rempel (olerem) wrote on 2007-12-05: #24 1.

Wysocki 2009-02-11 13:16:25 UTC (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=20194) [details] > dmesg > > dmesg without additional options Hm. Can I safely install it on feisty? If a question you asked has been answered, accept the best answer by clicking on the checkbox on the left side of the answer. Already downloaded the kernels and stuff, and ready to build a new one.

Thank your helpers by up-voting their comments and answers. Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1 Especially not to the kernel...arch devs help me out here? IIRC, the goal is to completely eliminate the old IDE > subsystem in favor of libata. https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/94031/how-to-deal-with-ata100-failed-to-set-xfermode-err_mask0x40-error/ lol Offline #5 2010-11-04 22:44:15 mangus Member From: Bologna, Italy Registered: 2007-04-07 Posts: 289 Re: ata2.00: failed to set xfermode (err_mask=0x4) since 2.6.36 I don't think tpowa the kernel mantainer is

Arch's good 'ole stable "LTS"kernel - from now on, I'm gonna keep a copy of those around, just in case. Ubuntu starts and errors occours right away. 3. sudo apt-get install kernel-package libncurses5-dev fakeroot wget bzip2 wget http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 wget http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/testing/patch-2.6.24-rc4.bz2 bzip2 -cd linux-2.6.23.tar.bz2 | tar xf - cd linux-2.6.23 bzip2 -cd ../patch-2.6.24-rc4.bz2 | patch -p1 cat /home/lex/Desktop/sata_sil-irq-fix.patch | patch Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0.

Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x1

Content on this site is licensed under a CC-BY-SA 3.0 license. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12631 Report a bug This report contains Public information Edit Everyone can see this information. Failed To Set Xfermode Err_mask 0x40 Ubuntu Logo, Ubuntu and Canonical Canonical Ltd. Also, can you try booting with the irqpoll boot option to see if this helps?

Comment 46 Rob Geelen 2009-07-21 17:59:37 UTC Hi, sounds crazy, but it has been since redhat 9 that I lost all track of linux. weblink Last edited by scjet (2013-01-25 05:50:14) Offline #6 2013-01-25 07:33:57 BigF Member Registered: 2012-02-17 Posts: 44 Re: [Solved]Invisable SATA drives Thank you so much for following up,and,You are very right on re: "adaptec 5805" ? -yep, it's a beautiful hardware beast (for its time), and fast, at about 500 MB's/sec (r/w) fairly-steady-transfer using (hardware)-RAID10-(8-2TB Hitachi's sata's), "r/w'ing" across to his 2 striped Just for the record, the last thing I tried with cmdline according to forums: acpi=noirq, no effect): Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset Linux version 2.6.26.8-1.0.11.smp.gcc3.4.x86.i686 (openfiler.rpath.org@ofns:2-devel) (gcc version 3.4.4 ) #1 SMP

Thanks again for your assistance ! do you think any particular combination on the "pci=" cmdline setting could help ? I'm guessing that can't happen until issues > such as this case are resolved. > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ide" in the body of a navigate here CPA: page pool initialized 1 of 1 pages preallocated SLUB: Genslabs=12, HWalign=128, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=2, Nodes=1 Calibrating delay using timer specific routine.. 5639.46 BogoMIPS (lpj=11278924) Security Framework initialized SELinux: Disabled at

Best is you compile in (not as a module) your needed sata and other most important drivers (you could even try to leave out ata_piix and only put in sata_sx4 on Thanks Changed in linux: assignee: ubuntu-kernel-team → timg-tpi status: Triaged → In Progress Ben Collins (ben-collins) wrote on 2007-12-12: #31 Amit, this looks like a good candidate for a an update But my ide card still not working: [ 193.532000] pccard: PCMCIA card inserted into slot 2 [ 193.532000] cs: memory probe 0xf7d00000-0xf7dfffff: excluding 0xf7d00000-0xf7d1ffff 0xf7df0000-0xf7dfffff [ 193.540000] pcmcia: registering new device

edit retag flag offensive close merge delete Be the first one to answer this question!

Details Message ID [email protected] State Not Applicable Delegated to: David Miller Headers show Return-Path: X-Original-To: [email protected] Delivered-To: [email protected] Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C492B7CF1 For some reason, running the previous kernel (2.6.15.1) for a while let the system's hard drive (hda) corrupted and unbootable (not the ones connected to sata_sx4 controller (sda,sdb,sdc,sdd)). The linux pre-compiled drivers obviously do not work on newer kernels/distros. Evidently, there are sda and sdb in there, with partitions.

Also occours after a install of Gutsy. > > One of the disks are recognized, a WesternDigital 3200 SATA disk. > The one not recognized is also a WesternDigital 1200 disk, At this point I made the new kernel, even without the patch (unless this is accidently picked up somewhere, but I doubt that). Running Ubuntu Server 9.04, uname output below: "2.6.28-11-server #42 Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 02:48:10 UTC 2009" I have re-arranged the controller in different pci slots, attempted to run it with his comment is here Good to see I'm not alone, especially the last one (EvilNed) seems to be identical to my issue.

Comment on this change (optional) Email me about changes to this bug report linux (Ubuntu) Edit Fix Released High Unassigned Edit Ubuntu hardy-alpha-5 You need to log in to change